Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 26.06.2025 14:46

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Which city should one visit between Nice and Cannes? Why?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Stocks to Open Flat as Trade Pact Details Awaited: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
What's the importance of promotion in marketing?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Thank you.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Poll: Is Xbox heading in the right direction? Cast your vote here! - Windows Central
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Steam gamers given 24 hours to grab hit game completely free - GAMINGbible
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Draisaitl says Perry rallied Oilers: 'When he speaks up, you listen' - theScore.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?